Male germline development in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii

in Reproduction
View More View Less
  • 1 School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to M B Renfree; Email: m.renfree@unimelb.edu.au

(O W Griffith is now at Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia)

Restricted access

Male germ cells undergo two consecutive processes – pre-spermatogenesis and spermatogenesis – to generate mature sperm. In eutherian mammals, epigenetic information such as DNA methylation is dynamically reprogrammed during pre-spermatogenesis, before and during mitotic arrest. In mice, by the time germ cells resume mitosis, the majority of DNA methylation is reprogrammed. The tammar wallaby has a similar pattern of germ cell global DNA methylation reprogramming to that of the mouse during early pre-spermatogenesis. However, early male germline development in the tammar or in any marsupial has not been described previously, so it is unknown whether this is a general feature regulating male germline development or a more recent phenomenon in mammalian evolutionary history. To answer this, we examined germ cell nuclear morphology and mitotic arrest during male germline development in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), a marsupial that diverged from mice and humans around 160 million years ago. Tammar pro-spermatogonia proliferated after birth and entered mitotic arrest after day 30 postpartum (pp). At this time, they began moving towards the periphery of the testis cords and their nuclear size increased. Germ cells increased in number after day 100 pp which is the time that DNA methylation is known to be re-established in the tammar. This is similar to the pattern observed in the mouse, suggesting that resumption of germ cell mitosis and the timing of DNA methylation reprogramming are correlated and conserved across mammals and over long evolutionary timescales.

Supplementary Materials

 

     An official journal of

    Society for Reproduction and Fertility

 

Sept 2018 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 332 332 199
Full Text Views 34 34 16
PDF Downloads 31 31 23
  • Arney KL & Fisher AG 2004 Epigenetic aspects of differentiation. Journal of Cell Science 117 43554363. (https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01390)

  • Bailis JM & Forsburg SL 2003 It’s all in the timing: linking S phase to chromatin structure and chromosome dynamics. Cell Cycle 2 303306. (https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.2.4.434)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartolomei MS & Ferguson-Smith AC 2011 Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3 a002592. (https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a002592)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coffigny H, Bourgeois C, Ricoul M, Bernardino J, Vilain A, Niveleau A, Malfoy B & Dutrillaux B 2000 Alterations of DNA methylation patterns in germ cells and Sertoli cells from developing mouse testis. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 87 175181. (https://doi.org/10.1159/000015460)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Culty M 2009 Gonocytes, the forgotten cells of the germ cell lineage. Birth Defects Research: Part C, Embryo Today 87 126. (https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20142)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ernst C, Odom DT & Kutter C 2017 The emergence of piRNAs against transposon invasion to preserve mammalian genome integrity. Nature Communications 8 1411. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01049-7)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franke FE, Pauls K, Rey R, Marks A, Bergmann M & Steger K 2004 Differentiation markers of Sertoli cells and germ cells in fetal and early postnatal human testis. Anatomy and Embryology 209 169177. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-004-0434-x)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fukushima S, Terasaki M, Sakata K, Miyagi N, Kato S, Sugita Y & Shigemori M 2009 Sensitivity and usefulness of anti-phosphohistone-H3 antibody immunostaining for counting mitotic figures in meningioma cases. Brain Tumor Pathology 26 5157. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-009-0249-9)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA & Surani MA 2013 Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339 448452. (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229277)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hargan-Calvopina J, Taylor S, Cook H, Hu Z, Lee SA, Yen MR, Chiang YS, Chen PY & Clark AT 2016 Stage-specific demethylation in primordial germ cells safeguards against precocious differentiation. Developmental Cell 39 7586. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.07.019)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ishihara T, Hickford D, Shaw G, Pask AJ & Renfree MB 2019 DNA methylation dynamics in the germline of the marsupial tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii. DNA Research 26 8594. (https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsy040)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kafri T, Ariel M, Brandeis M, Shemer R, Urven L, McCarrey J, Cedar H & Razin A 1992 Developmental pattern of gene-specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germ line. Genes and Development 6 705714. (https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.5.705)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kawasaki Y, Lee J, Matsuzawa A, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T & Ishino F 2014 Active DNA demethylation is required for complete imprint erasure in primordial germ cells. Scientific Reports 4 3658. (https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03658)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kluin PM & Rooij DG 1981 A comparison between the morphology and cell kinetics of gonocytes and adult type undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse. International Journal of Andrology 4 475493. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1981.tb00732.x)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kocer A, Reichmann J, Best D & Adams IR 2009 Germ cell sex determination in mammals. Molecular Human Reproduction 15 205213. (https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gap008)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu J & Gilbert DM 2007 Proliferation-dependent and cell cycle-regulated transcription of mouse pericentric heterochromatin. Journal of Cell Biology 179 411421. (https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200706176)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luo ZX, Yuan CX, Meng QJ & Ji Q 2011 A Jurassic eutherian mammal and divergence of marsupials and placentals. Nature 476 442445. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10291)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsui Y & Mochizuki K 2014 A current view of the epigenome in mouse primordial germ cells. Molecular Reproduction and Development 81 160170. (https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22214)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCarrey JR 2013 Toward a more precise and informative nomenclature describing fetal and neonatal male germ cells in rodents. Biology of Reproduction 89 47. (https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.113.110502)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLaren A 1992 Development of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Andrologia 24 243247. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1992.tb02647.x)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLaren A 2001 Mammalian germ cells: birth, sex, and immortality. Cell Structure and Function 26 119122. (https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.26.119)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poole WE, Simms NG, Wood JT & Lubulwa M 1991 Tables for Age Determination of the Kangaroo Island Wallaby (Tammar) Macropus eugenii. CSIRO. (https://doi.org/10.4225/08/58a5e9b2bf231)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pui HP & Saga Y 2018 NANOS2 acts as an intrinsic regulator of gonocytes-to-spermatogonia transition in the murine testes. Mechanisms of Development 149 2740. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2018.01.001)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sasaki H & Matsui Y 2008 Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nature Reviews: Genetics 9 129140. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2295)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suzuki A & Saga Y 2008 Nanos2 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell differentiation. Genes and Development 22 430435. (https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1612708)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suzuki S, Shaw G & Renfree MB 2013 Postnatal epigenetic reprogramming in the germline of a marsupial, the tammar wallaby. Epigenetics and Chromatin 6 14. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-6-14)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wartenberg H 1978 Human testicular development and the role of the mesonephros in the origin of a dual Sertoli cell system. Andrologia 10 121. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1978.tb01306.x)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Western PS, Miles DC, van den Bergen JA, Burton M & Sinclair AH 2008 Dynamic regulation of mitotic arrest in fetal Male germ cells. Stem Cells 26 339347. (https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0622)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu R, Terry AV, Singh PB & Gilbert DM 2005 Differential subnuclear localization and replication timing of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation states. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16 28722881. (https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-11-0997)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yamaguchi S, Hong K, Liu R, Shen L, Inoue A, Diep D, Zhang K & Zhang Y 2012 Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 492 443447. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11709)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yoshioka H, McCarrey JR & Yamazaki Y 2009 Dynamic nuclear organization of constitutive heterochromatin during fetal male germ cell development in mice. Biology of Reproduction 80 804812. (https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.072603)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation