Sperm cryopreservation has been recognised as a tool for preventing loss of genetic diversity in amphibians; however, the combined effect of penetrative and non-penetrative cryoprotectants in cryodiluents is poorly understood. We demonstrate a clear benefit of using low concentrations of non-penetrative cryoprotectants when cryopreserving sperm of Australian tree frogs.
Sperm cryopreservation protocols have been developed for an increasing number of amphibian species since the recognition of a global amphibian decline. Yet, the development of these protocols has neglected to elucidate the combined effect of the penetrative(PCP) and non-penetrative cryoprotectant (NPCP) on the recovery of live, motile sperm. The two-factor hypothesis of cryoinjury recognises a trade-off between cooling cells slowly enough to allow osmotic dehydration and therefore avoid intracellular ice formation, but fast enough to minimise effects from increasing extracellular osmolality as the frozen fraction of the media increases during freezing. We tested the effect of two concentrations of a PCP (10 and 15% v/v dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO)) and two concentrations of an NPCP (1 and 10% w/v sucrose) in various combinations on the sperm of six pelodryadid frogs. In all species, 15% v/v Me2SO with 1% w/v sucrose provided superior post-thaw recovery with high proportions of forward progressive motility, live cells and intact acrosomes (typically >50% for each). Theoretically, it has been suggested that increased NPCP concentration should improve cell survival by increasing the rate and extent of cell dehydration. We suggest, however, that the elevated osmolality in the unfrozen water fraction when 10% sucrose is used may be causing damage to cells via excessive cell shrinkage and solute effects as proposed in the two-factor hypothesis of cryoinjury. We showed this response in sperm across a range of frog species, providing compelling evidence for this hypothesis. We suggest protocol development using the PCP/NPCP ratios demonstrated in our study will be broadly applicable to many amphibian species.
Reproduction is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
|Sept 2018 onwards||Past Year||Past 30 Days|
|Full Text Views||37||37||28|