Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: Valentina Lodde x
- Refine by access: Content accessible to me x
Search for other papers by Alberto M Luciano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, Department of Animal Pathology and Veterinary Public Health, Department of Cell Biology, Department of Animal Sciences
Search for other papers by Valentina Lodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federica Franciosi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabrizio Ceciliani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John J Peluso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Although the mRNA that encodes progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is present in mammalian oocytes, nothing is known about either PGRMC1's expression pattern or function in oocytes during maturation, fertilization, and subsequent embryonic development. As PGRMC1 associates with the mitotic spindle in somatic cells, we hypothesized that PGRMC1 is involved in oocyte maturation (meiosis). Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of PGRMC1 in bovine oocytes. This study also shows that PGRMC1 is present at the germinal vesicle (GV)- and MII-stage oocytes and is associated with male and female pronucleus formation of the zygote and is highly expressed in blastocysts. A more detailed examination of PGRMC1 localization using confocal imaging demonstrated that in GV-stage oocytes, PGRMC1 was concentrated throughout the GV but did not localize to the chromatin. With the resumption of meiosis in vitro, PGRMC1 concentrated in the centromeric region of metaphase I chromosomes, while in the anaphase I/telophase I stages the majority of PGRMC1 concentrated between the separating chromosomes. At the metaphase II stage, PGRMC1 re-associated with the centromeric region of the chromosomes. A colocalization study demonstrated that PGRMC1 associated with the phosphorylated form of aurora kinase B, which localizes to the centromeres at metaphase. Finally, PGRMC1 antibody injection significantly lowered the percentage of oocytes that matured and reached the metaphase II stage after 24 h of culture. The majority of the PGRMC1 antibody-injected oocytes arrested in the prometaphase I stage of meiosis. Furthermore, in most of the PGRMC1 antibody-injected oocytes, the chromosomes were disorganized and scattered. Taken together, these data demonstrate that PGRMC1 is expressed in bovine oocytes and its localization changes at specific stages of oocyte maturation. These observations suggest an important role for PGRMC1 in oocyte maturation, which may be specifically related to the mechanism by which chromosomes segregate.
Search for other papers by Laura Terzaghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Maria Luciano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Priscila C Dall’Acqua in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Silvia C Modina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John J Peluso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valentina Lodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Progesterone receptor membrane component-1 (PGRMC1) is a highly conserved multifunctional protein that is found in numerous systems, including reproductive system. Interestingly, PGRMC1 is expressed at several intracellular locations, including the nucleolus. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional relationship between PGRMC1 and nucleolus. Immunofluorescence experiments confirmed PGRMC1’s nucleolar localization in cultured bovine granulosa cells (bGC) and oocytes. Additional experiments conducted on bGC revealed that PGRMC1 co-localizes with nucleolin (NCL), a major nucleolar protein. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (RNAi)-mediated gene silencing experiments showed that when PGRMC1 expression was depleted, NCL translocated from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Similarly, oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment, reduced PGRMC1 immunofluorescent signal in the nucleolus and increased NCL nucleoplasmic signal, when compared to non-treated cells. Although PGRMC1 influenced NCL localization, a direct interaction between these two proteins was not detected using in situ proximity ligation assay. This suggests the involvement of additional molecules in mediating the co-localization of PGRMC1 and nucleolin. Since nucleolin translocates into the nucleoplasm in response to various cellular stressors, PGRMC1’s ability to regulate its localization within the nucleolus is likely an important component of mechanism by which cells response to stress. This concept is consistent with PGRMC1’s well-described ability to promote ovarian cell survival and provides a rationale for future studies on PGRMC1, NCL and the molecular mechanism by which these two proteins protect against the adverse effect of cellular stressors, including oxidative stress.
Search for other papers by Anna Lange-Consiglio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudia Perrini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giulia Albini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Silvia Modina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valentina Lodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleonora Orsini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paola Esposti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Search for other papers by Fausto Cremonesi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The effect of conditioned medium (CM) or microvesicles (MVs), secreted by multicellular spheroids of oviductal cells, and the involvement of some microRNAs (miRNAs) were investigated in canine oocyte maturation. To generate CM, spheroids were cultured for 3 days. MVs were obtained by ultracentrifugation of CM at 100,000 g and measured for size and concentration by NanoSight instrument. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured at 38.5°C with 5% CO2 and 5% of O2 in synthetic oviductal fluid (SOF) in biphasic systems: for 24 h, with 5.0 μg/mL of LH and for other 48 h with 10% oestrous bitch serum. SOF was used as control (CTR) or supplemented with 10% CM or 25–50–75–100–150 × 106 MVs/mL labeled with PKH-26. Results show that multicellular aggregates secreted shedding vesicles. By fluorescence microscopy, the incorporation of labeled MVs was visible only at 72 h in oocyte cytoplasm. These MVs had a positive effect (P < 0.05) on maturation rate (MII) at the concentration of 75 and 100 × 106 MVs/mL compared to CM and CTR (20.34% and 21.82% vs 9.09% and 8.66% respectively). The concentration of 150 × 106 MVs/mL provided only 9.26% of MII. The expression of three specific miRNAs (miR-30b, miR-375 and miR-503) was studied. The lower rate of MII with the higher concentration of MVs is possibly due to the high level of miR-375. In conclusion, the oviductal MVs could be involved in cellular trafficking during oocyte maturation and their possible use in vitro could facilitate the exploitment of canine reproductive biotechnologies.