Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for

  • Author: Jacqueline A Maybin x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Jacqueline A Maybin MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Jacqueline A Maybin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Free access
Jacqueline A Maybin Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – Little France, 49 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK

Search for other papers by Jacqueline A Maybin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
W Colin Duncan Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – Little France, 49 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK

Search for other papers by W Colin Duncan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Studies comparing the regressing corpus luteum with the rescued corpus luteum have demonstrated that human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) has effects on cell types that do not express hCG receptors. As progesterone synthesis is hCG dependent and the corpus luteum has been shown to express genomic progesterone receptors, progesterone is a candidate molecule for these paracrine effects. This study aimed to define the cellular localisation of progesterone receptors in the human corpus luteum using dual-staining immunohistochemistry for genomic progesterone receptors and specific cellular markers. Well-characterised corpora lutea (n = 12) from different stages of the luteal phase were studied. The same distribution was observed in all corpora lutea examined. The steroidogenic cells (3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase positive) and both thecalutein (17α-hydroxylase positive) and granulosalutein (aromatase positive) express progesterone receptors, as do stromal fibroblasts (vimentin positive, fibroblast antigen positive). Vascular endothelial cells (CD31 positive), pericytes (α-smooth muscle actin positive), macrophages (CD68 positive) and fibroblasts within the central clot do not express nuclear progesterone receptors. Progesterone is a candidate messenger molecule for the effects of hCG on the matrix metalloproteinase-producing stromal fibroblasts. Some of the effects of hCG on steroidogenic cells may be mediated by progesterone, but its effects on blood vessels and macrophages require alternate paracrine signalling mechanisms. In addition, there appears to be at least two fibroblast populations in the corpus luteum.

Free access
W Colin Duncan Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – Little France, 49 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK

Search for other papers by W Colin Duncan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eva Gay Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – Little France, 49 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK

Search for other papers by Eva Gay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jacqueline A Maybin Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – Little France, 49 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK

Search for other papers by Jacqueline A Maybin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The human corpus luteum expresses genomic progesterone receptors (PRs) suggesting that progesterone may have an autocrine or paracrine role in luteal function. We hypothesised that the reduction in luteal PR reported in the late-luteal phase augmented progesterone withdrawal and had a role in luteolysis. We therefore tested the hypothesis that luteal rescue with human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) would maintain PR expression. PR was immunolocalised to different cell types in human corpora lutea (n = 35) from different stages of the luteal phase and after luteal rescue with exogenous hCG. There was no change in the staining intensity of theca-lutein cell or stromal cell PR throughout the luteal phase or after luteal rescue. In the late-luteal phase, granulosa-lutein cell PR immunostaining was reduced (P < 0.05) but the trend to reduction was also seen after luteal rescue with hCG (P = 0.055). To further investigate the effect of hCG on granulosa-lutein cell PR expression, an in vitro model system of cultured human luteinised granulosa cells was studied. Cells were cultured for 12–13 days exposed to different patterns of hCG and aminoglutethamide to manipulate progesterone secretion (P < 0.0001). Expression of PR A/B and PR B isoforms was examined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. PR A/B mRNA was lower (P < 0.05) after 11–13 days of culture than after 7 days of culture. This reduction could not be prevented by hCG in the presence (P < 0.05) or absence (P < 0.05) of stimulated progesterone secretion. The expression of PR B mRNA showed a similar pattern (P = 0.054). Simulated early pregnancy in vivo and hCG treatment of luteinised granulosa cells in vitro did not appear to prevent the down-regulation of PR seen during luteolysis.

Free access
Rocío Martínez-Aguilar MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Rocío Martínez-Aguilar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lucy E Kershaw Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Lucy E Kershaw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jane J Reavey MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Jane J Reavey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hilary O D Critchley MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Hilary O D Critchley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jacqueline A Maybin MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Jacqueline A Maybin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The endometrium is a multicellular tissue that is exquisitely responsive to the ovarian hormones. The local mechanisms of endometrial regulation to ensure optimal function are less well characterised. Transient physiological hypoxia has been proposed as a critical regulator of endometrial function. Herein, we review the literature on hypoxia in the non-pregnant endometrium. We discuss the pros and cons of animal models, human laboratory studies and novel in vivo imaging for the study of endometrial hypoxia. These research tools provide mounting evidence of a transient hypoxic episode in the menstrual endometrium and suggest that endometrial hypoxia may be present at the time of implantation. This local hypoxia may modify the inflammatory environment, influence vascular remodelling and modulate endometrial proliferation to optimise endometrial function. Finally, we review current knowledge of the impact of this hypoxia on endometrial pathologies, with a focus on abnormal uterine bleeding. Throughout the manuscript areas for future research are highlighted with the aim of concentrating research efforts to maximise future benefits for women and society.

Free access