Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: B Nixon x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
B J Houston Priority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences

Search for other papers by B J Houston in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B Nixon Priority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences

Search for other papers by B Nixon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B V King School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Search for other papers by B V King in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G N De Iuliis Priority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences

Search for other papers by G N De Iuliis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R J Aitken Priority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences

Search for other papers by R J Aitken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Mobile phone usage has become an integral part of our lives. However, the effects of the radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by these devices on biological systems and specifically the reproductive systems are currently under active debate. A fundamental hindrance to the current debate is that there is no clear mechanism of how such non-ionising radiation influences biological systems. Therefore, we explored the documented impacts of RF-EMR on the male reproductive system and considered any common observations that could provide insights on a potential mechanism. Among a total of 27 studies investigating the effects of RF-EMR on the male reproductive system, negative consequences of exposure were reported in 21. Within these 21 studies, 11 of the 15 that investigated sperm motility reported significant declines, 7 of 7 that measured the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) documented elevated levels and 4 of 5 studies that probed for DNA damage highlighted increased damage due to RF-EMR exposure. Associated with this, RF-EMR treatment reduced the antioxidant levels in 6 of 6 studies that discussed this phenomenon, whereas consequences of RF-EMR were successfully ameliorated with the supplementation of antioxidants in all 3 studies that carried out these experiments. In light of this, we envisage a two-step mechanism whereby RF-EMR is able to induce mitochondrial dysfunction leading to elevated ROS production. A continued focus on research, which aims to shed light on the biological effects of RF-EMR will allow us to test and assess this proposed mechanism in a variety of cell types.

Free access