Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author: B. W. Norton x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by S. W. Walkden-Brown in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B. J. Restall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B. W. Norton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. J. Scaramuzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The effects of season, diet and exposure to oestrous females on LH and testosterone secretion were examined in mature cashmere bucks to determine whether there is a seasonal cycle of LH and testosterone secretion, and whether this can be modulated by long-term differential nutrition and exposure to oestrous females. Three-year-old bucks were individually housed under natural photoperiod at 29°S 153°E and fed diets of high (crude protein 17.6%, metabolizable energy 8.3 MJ kg−1) or low (crude protein 6.9%, metabolizable energy 6.6 MJ kg−1) quality for 16 months ad libitum (n = 6 per treatment). Blood samples were collected to determine pulsatile LH and testosterone secretion immediately before experimental feeding, one month later, and every second month thereafter. Samples were collected for an 8 h period on successive days with the bucks isolated on the first day and each exposed to a single oestrous doe for the duration of the second day. In the absence of oestrous females, bucks exhibited a circannual pattern of secretion for both hormones with pulse frequency and mean concentrations highest in late summer and autumn and lowest in late winter and spring. Testosterone pulse amplitude followed a similar pattern, but LH pulse amplitude was highest in spring and lowest in autumn, indicating a seasonal shift in the relationship between the two hormones. Exposure to oestrous does increased LH and testosterone secretion depending on both season and diet. Responses were evident during summer, autumn and early winter, with bucks on a high quality diet exhibiting an earlier and more prolonged period of responsiveness than did bucks on a low quality diet, peaking in February compared with June. The magnitude of the LH and testosterone response was also significantly greater in bucks on a high quality diet. Weight loss during autumn appeared to reduce responsiveness in both treatments. These results demonstrate that there is a seasonal cycle in LH and testosterone secretion in mature cashmere bucks, and that nutrition and oestrous females are powerful modulators of the secretion of these hormones in a seasonally dependent way.
Search for other papers by S. W. Walkden-Brown in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B. J. Restall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B. W. Norton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. J. Scaramuzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. B. Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The effects of season and diet on LH, FSH and testosterone concentrations, testicular mass, sebaceous gland volume and male odour were examined in mature Australian cashmere goat bucks fed ad libitum with diets of low or high quality for 16 months under natural photoperiod at 29°S, 153°E (n = 6 per treatment). Each week plasma was sampled, the bucks were weighed, scored for male odour and assessed for testicular mass based on scrotal circumference. Each month a skin sample was taken from the occipital region for histological assessment of sebaceous gland volume. For each variable there was a clear circannual cycle that was significantly influenced by dietary treatment. In bucks fed the low-quality diet, the timing of seasonal changes in LH and testosterone concentration, sebaceous gland volume and odour score was similar, with a mid-autumn peak. In each case the high-quality diet advanced, extended the duration and increased the magnitude of the seasonal increase. FSH concentrations peaked in late spring (in bucks on the high-quality diet) or summer (in bucks on the low-quality diet), reaching a nadir in early winter. The high-quality diet significantly increased concentrations only in the last 2 months of the experiment (spring). There was no overall association between these variables and change in testicular mass; instead, it was strongly correlated with voluntary feed intake and change in body mass, themselves subject to seasonal variation with a winter or spring peak. The high-quality diet induced large increases in body mass and testicular mass during the first months of the experiment without influencing the seasonally low concentrations of FSH, LH and testosterone present at the time. These results demonstrate that the male, like the female, Australian cashmere goat, exhibits marked reproductive seasonality, and that nutrition is a powerful modulator of the seasonal cycle. They suggest that testosterone concentration, sebaceous gland volume and odour score are ultimately dependent upon LH secretion, which appears to be under strong seasonal (photoperiodic) control, with the effects of enhanced nutrition limited to periods when photoperiodic inhibition is waning. However, seasonal regulation of testicular mass, and therefore sperm production, appears to be primarily dependent on changes in voluntary feed intake and growth, with the seasonal cycle of testicular mass more a consequence of the seasonal appetite or growth cycle than of changing gonadotrophin concentrations.