Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for

  • Author: Giovanna Lazzari x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Cesare Galli Avantea and Fondazione Avantea Onlus, Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Giovanna Lazzari Avantea and Fondazione Avantea Onlus, Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

SCNT (somatic cell nuclear transfer) has complemented the toolbox of ARTs offering yet another technique to reproduce animals in an unprecedented way. Despite remarkable achievements, SCNT suffers low efficiency, high pregnancy losses and higher than normal stillbirth rates that makes it an expensive technique to reproduce animals. Moreover, due to welfare issues associated with gestation and the newborn offspring, it is banned in some countries. It has become evident that these problems are of epigenetic nature associated with incomplete genome reprogramming, observed more frequently in ruminants and less often and of minor degree in pigs and horses. Genome editing is enormously benefiting from SCNT to turn genome edited cells into animals, even if zygote microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 will become an alternative route in some occasions. SCNT will also be a route to reprogram somatic cell to pluripotency since bona fide iPSC in livestock are missing while embryonic stem cells have been now established. This opens the way to other technologies like the development of artificial gametes or interspecies nuclear transfer. To strengthen its commercial applications, SCNT will face three major challenges, that is, intellectual property (extremely unclear in genome editing), regulatory approval by the relevant authorities of the resuting potential products and finally, acceptance by the public who will eventually decide with its behavior the life or the death of the technology.

Free access
Irina Lagutina Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Irina Lagutina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Helena Fulka Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Helena Fulka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tiziana A L Brevini Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Tiziana A L Brevini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefania Antonini Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefania Antonini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dario Brunetti Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Dario Brunetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Silvia Colleoni Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Silvia Colleoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fulvio Gandolfi Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Fulvio Gandolfi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanna Lazzari Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Josef Fulka Jr Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Josef Fulka Jr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Cesare Galli Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy
Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Institute of Animal Science, Biomedical Embryology Unit, Department of Animal Science, University of Milan, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Avantea srl, Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The best results of inter-species somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) in mammals were obtained using closely related species that can hybridise naturally. However, in the last years, many reports describing blastocyst development following iSCNT between species with distant taxonomical relations (inter-classes, inter-order and inter-family) have been published. This indicates that embryonic genome activation (EGA) in xeno-cytoplasm is possible, albeit very rarely. Using a bovine–pig (inter-family) iSCNT model, we studied the basic characteristics of EGA: expression and activity of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II), formation of nucleoli (as an indicator of RNA polymerase I (RNA Pol I) activity), expression of the key pluripotency gene NANOG and alteration of mitochondrial mass. In control embryos (obtained by IVF or iSCNT), EGA was characterised by RNA Pol II accumulation and massive production of poly-adenylated transcripts (detected with oligo dT probes) in blastomere nuclei, and formation of nucleoli as a result of RNA Pol I activity. Conversely, iSCNT embryos were characterised by the absence of accumulation and low activity of RNA Pol II and inability to form active mature nucleoli. Moreover, in iSCNT embryos, NANOG was not expressed, and mitochondria mass was significantly lower than in intra-species embryos. Finally, the complete developmental block at the 16–25-cell stage for pig–bovine iSCNT embryos and at the four-cell stage for bovine–pig iSCNT embryos strongly suggests that EGA is not taking place in iSCNT embryos. Thus, our experiments clearly demonstrate poor nucleus–cytoplasm compatibility between these animal species.

Free access
Irina Lagutina Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Irina Lagutina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanna Lazzari Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberto Duchi Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Roberto Duchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Silvia Colleoni Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Silvia Colleoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nunzia Ponderato Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Nunzia Ponderato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paola Turini Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Paola Turini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gabriella Crotti Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Gabriella Crotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Cesare Galli Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Universitàdi Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The objective of the present work was to investigate and clarify the factors affecting the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) in the horse, including embryo reconstruction, in vitro culture to the blastocyst stage, embryo transfer, pregnancy monitoring and production of offspring. Matured oocytes, with zona pellucida or after zona removal, were fused to cumulus cells, granulosa cells, and fetal and adult fibroblasts, and fused couplets were cultured in vitro. Blastocyst development to Day 8 varied significantly among donor cells (from 1.3% to 16%, P < 0.05). In total, 137 nuclear transfer-embryos were transferred nonsurgically to 58 recipient mares. Pregnancy rate after transfer of NT-embryos derived from adult fibroblasts from three donor animals was 24.3% (9/37 mares transferred corresponding to 9/101 blastocysts transferred), while only 1/18 (5.6%) of NT-blastocysts derived from one fetal cell line gave rise to a pregnancy (corresponding to 1/33 blastocysts transferred). Overall, seven pregnancies were confirmed at 35 days, and two went to term delivering two live foals. One foal died 40 h after birth of acute septicemia while the other foal was healthy and is currently 2 months old. These results indicate that (a) the zona-free method allows high fusion rate and optimal use of equine oocytes, (b) different donor cell cultures have different abilities to support blastocyst development, (c) blastocyst formation rate does not correlate with pregnancy fate and (d) healthy offspring can be obtained by somatic cell nuclear transfer in the horse.

Free access
Irina Lagutina Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Irina Lagutina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Valeri Zakhartchenko Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Valeri Zakhartchenko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Helena Fulka Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Helena Fulka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Silvia Colleoni Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Silvia Colleoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eckhard Wolf Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Eckhard Wolf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Josef Fulka Jr Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Josef Fulka Jr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanna Lazzari Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Cesare Galli Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy
Avantea, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science, Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Avantea srl., Via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The most successful development of interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) embryos has been achieved in closely related species. The analyses of embryonic gene activity in iSCNT embryos of different species combinations have revealed the existence of significant aberrations in expression of housekeeping genes and genes dependent on the major embryonic genome activation (EGA). However, there are many studies with successful blastocyst (BL) development of iSCNT embryos derived from donor cells and oocytes of animal species with distant taxonomical relations (inter-family/inter-class) that should indicate proper EGA at least in terms of RNA polymerase I activation, nucleoli formation, and activation of genes engaged in morula and BL formation. We investigated the ability of bovine, porcine, and rabbit oocytes to activate embryonic nucleoli formation in the nuclei of somatic cells of different mammalian species. In iSCNT embryos, nucleoli precursor bodies originate from the oocyte, while most proteins engaged in the formation of mature nucleoli should be transcribed from genes de novo in the donor nucleus at the time of EGA. Thus, the success of nucleoli formation depends on species compatibility of many components of this complex process. We demonstrate that the time and cell stage of nucleoli formation are under the control of recipient ooplasm. Oocytes of the studied species possess different abilities to support nucleoli formation. Formation of nucleoli, which is a complex but small part of the whole process of EGA, is essential but not absolutely sufficient for the development of iSCNT embryos to the morula and BL stages.

Free access
Roberto Puglisi Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Roberto Puglisi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberta Vanni Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Roberta Vanni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrea Galli Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Andrea Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Donatella Balduzzi Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Donatella Balduzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Katia Parati Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Katia Parati in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Graziella Bongioni Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Graziella Bongioni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gabriella Crotti Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Gabriella Crotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberto Duchi Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Roberto Duchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cesare Galli Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanna Lazzari Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Riccardo Aleandri Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Viale Forlanini 23, 20134 Milan, Italy, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, via Porcellasco 7/f, 26100 Cremona, Italy and Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy

Search for other papers by Riccardo Aleandri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The methodologies used for cytometric sorting of fresh spermatozoa never allowed a clear resolution of sexual chromosomes of frozen–thawed semen. To devise a novel method for the production of bovine predefined sexed embryos using frozen–thawed semen, sorting efficiency of different protocols was studied using a new quantitative real-time PCR method to verify the purity of sexed semen. To this aim, after Percoll separation, frozen–thawed samples were stained at different temperatures and concentrations of Hoechst 33342 using a short-incubation time. The concentration of Hoechst 33342 of 500 μg/ml at a temperature of 37 °C provided good and stable fluorescence signals. Preventing the sperm clustering by adding 0.6% BSA in the 90% Percoll fraction led to X-bearing sperms purity of 91±2%. Thereafter, sorted sperms were used for in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Despite the lower cleavage rates reported in the sorted groups when compared with the control groups (40 vs 48%, P<0.01), blastocyst formation in the sorted and control groups was not different (27 vs 24% of the cleaved respectively). The PCR analysis of 30 blastocysts confirmed 26 embryos to be correctly sexed (87%). Transfer of two embryos per recipient into six synchronised heifers resulted in four pregnancies. Two abortions occurred at day 60, while two pregnancies went to term delivering two female calves. In conclusion, high purity and repeatabilityof sorting was obtained with frozen–thawed bull semen that was subsequently used for IVF giving rise toviable embryos and offspring. In addition, real-time PCR revealed to be an optimal support for these studies, providing a rapid and reliable estimation of flowcytometric efficiency.

Free access
Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany
Freie Universitat Berlin, Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Susanne Holtze Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Susanne Holtze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Silvia Colleoni AVANTEA, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Lombardy, Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Silvia Colleoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert Hermes Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Robert Hermes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan Stejskal ZOO Dvůr Králové, Communication and International Projects, Štefánikova, Dvůr Králové nad Labem, Czech Republic

Search for other papers by Jan Stejskal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Isaac Lekolool Kenya Wildlife Service, Veterinary and Capture Services, Nairobi, Kenya

Search for other papers by Isaac Lekolool in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David Ndeereh Wildlife Training and Research Institute, Nakuru County, Naivasha, Kenya

Search for other papers by David Ndeereh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick Omondi Kenya Wildlife Service, Veterinary and Capture Services, Nairobi, Kenya

Search for other papers by Patrick Omondi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Linus Kariuki Kenya Wildlife Service, Veterinary and Capture Services, Nairobi, Kenya

Search for other papers by Linus Kariuki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Domnic Mijele Kenya Wildlife Service, Veterinary and Capture Services, Nairobi, Kenya

Search for other papers by Domnic Mijele in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel Mutisya Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Conservation Laikipia, Nanyuki, Kenya

Search for other papers by Samuel Mutisya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephen Ngulu Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Conservation Laikipia, Nanyuki, Kenya

Search for other papers by Stephen Ngulu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sebastian Diecke Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Technology Platform Pluripotent Stem Cells, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Sebastian Diecke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Katsuhiko Hayashi Department of Stem Cell Biology and Medicine, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashiku, Fukuoka, Japan
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Search for other papers by Katsuhiko Hayashi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanna Lazzari AVANTEA, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Lombardy, Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanna Lazzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Barbara de Mori Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Universita degli Studi di Padova, Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Veneto, Padova, Italy

Search for other papers by Barbara de Mori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pierfrancesco Biasetti Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany
Universita degli Studi di Padova, Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Veneto, Padova, Italy

Search for other papers by Pierfrancesco Biasetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alessandra Quaggio Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Alessandra Quaggio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cesare Galli AVANTEA, Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Lombardy, Cremona, Italy
Fondazione Avantea, Riproduzione Cremona, Lombardy, Cremona, Italy

Search for other papers by Cesare Galli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frank Goeritz Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in the Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Reproduction Management, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Frank Goeritz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

In brief

To save endangered rhinoceros species, assisted reproductive technologies are warranted. We here report in vitro blastocyst generation of the Near-Threatened Southern white rhinoceros and, for the first time, also of the technically Extinct Northern white rhinoceros.

Abstract

The Anthropocene is marked by a dramatic biodiversity decline, particularly affecting the family Rhinocerotidae. Three of five extant species are listed as Critically Endangered (Sumatran, Javan, black rhinoceros), one as Vulnerable (Indian rhinoceros), and only one white rhino (WR) subspecies, the Southern white rhinoceros (SWR), after more than a century of successful protection is currently classified as Near Threatened by the IUCN, while numbers again are declining. Conversely, in 2008, the SWR’s northern counterpart and second WR subspecies, the Northern white rhinoceros (NWR), was declared extinct in the wild. Safeguarding these vanishing keystone species urgently requires new reproductive strategies. We here assess one such strategy, the novel in vitro fertilization program in SWR and – for the first-time NWR – regarding health effects, donor-related, and procedural factors. Over the past 8 years, we performed 65 procedures in 22 white rhinoceros females (20 SWR and 2 NWR) comprising hormonal ovarian stimulation, ovum pick-up (OPU), in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization, embryo culture, and blastocyst cryopreservation, at an efficiency of 1.0 ± 1.3 blastocysts per OPU, generating 22 NWR, 19 SWR and 10 SWR/NWR hybrid blastocysts for the future generation of live offspring.

Open access