Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: I C Dunn x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by I. C. Dunn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. J. Sharp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary. Photoperiodic response curves for LH release were obtained for juvenile female domestic chickens at 8 weeks of age by measuring changes in plasma LH concentrations after increasing the daily photoperiod from 8 to 10·5, 12·75, 15·25, 17·75 or 20 h. The birds were bred either for meat production (broiler) or commercial egg-laying and were fed ad libitum or a restricted diet, similar to that used under commercial conditions. Ovarian and oviduct growth was stimulated by 2 weeks after transfer to 20 h light/day in the dwarf broiler strain, irrespective of the dietary treatment, but not in birds of the egg-laying strain. Baseline concentrations of plasma LH were higher in the egg-laying than in the dwarf broiler strain birds. A significant effect of dietary treatment was observed on the changes in concentration of plasma LH in the nonphotostimulated dwarf broiler, but not in the egg-laying bird. There was no significant interaction between dietary treatment and photoinduced LH release in birds of either strain. The shortest photoperiod needed to stimulate LH release (critical daylength) was < 10·5 h in the dwarf broilers and between 10·5 and 12·75 h in the egg-laying birds. The shortest photoperiod needed to stimulate the maximum release of LH (saturation daylength) was between 10·5 and 12·75 h in the dwarf broiler strain. The saturation daylength in birds of the egg-laying strain was longer, being between 12·75 and 15·25 h. It is concluded that there are differences in the photoperiodic response between chickens of different breeds and that they are not modified by restriction of food intake to 50–60% of that in control birds fed ad libitum.
Keywords: domestic chicken; LH; photoperiodism; restricted feeding
Search for other papers by P. J. Sharp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I. C. Dunn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Cerolini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary. Egg-laying in hens exposed for more than 11 months to photostimulatory daylengths was intermittent and associated with a reduction in numbers of yellow-yolky ovarian follicles. Old laying hens (105 weeks) had lower concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the pituitary gland and plasma and reduced pituitary gland responsiveness to chicken LH-releasing-hormones (LHRH-I and II) in vivo when compared with young laying hens (28 weeks). Four weeks after transfer from 14 to 8 h light/day, egg production almost stopped in old, but not in young hens, although plasma LH concentrations decreased in all birds. After transfer from 14 to 20 h light/day, plasma LH increased in young, but not in old, hens, without a change in the rate of egg production. Reproductive function was enhanced in old hens returned to long days after induction of a moult and ovarian regression by reducing daylength and dietary restriction. Moulted hens had a greater rate of egg production, higher concentrations of plasma LH and a greater pituitary-gland responsiveness to LHRH-II in vivo than unmoulted control hens. After transfer from 14 to 8 h light/day, egg-laying decreased more rapidly in unmoulted than in moulted hens; transfer to 17 h light/day increased egg production in moulted, but not in unmoulted, birds. Induction of ovarian regression in old hens by dietary restriction alone also enhanced reproductive function after the dietary restriction was relaxed. Egg-laying was more persistent in hens brought into lay for a second year by transferring them from 3 to 11 h light/day than in hens transferred from 3 to 20 h light/day. Egg production was stimulated in hens maintained on 3 or 11 h light/day for 42 weeks, after transfer to 20 h light/day. Egg production ceased in hens maintained on 20 h light/day for 46 weeks, after transfer to 3 h light/day.
These observations are consistent with the view that poor persistence of laying in hens <2 years old and exposed continuously to long days is caused, in part, by a reduction in hypothalamic–gonadotroph function. This reduction in neuroendocrine function may be due, in part, to the development of relative photorefractoriness.
Keywords: ovary; ageing; chicken; LH; egg-laying; seasonal breeding; photorefractoriness
Search for other papers by B K Podisi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S A Knott in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I C Dunn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A S Law in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D W Burt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P M Hocking in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Critical age, weight and body composition have been suggested as necessary correlates of sexual maturity. A genome scan to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for age and body weight at first egg (AFE and WFE) was conducted on 912 birds from an F2 broiler–layer cross using 106 microsatellite markers. Without a covariate, QTL for body WFE were detected on chromosomes 2, 4, 8, 27 and Z and a single QTL for AFE was detected on chromosome 2. With AFE as a covariate, additional QTL for body WFE were found on chromosomes 1 and 13, with abdominal fat pad as covariate a QTL for body WFE was found on chromosome 1. With body WFE as covariate, additional QTL for AFE were found on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 13 and 27. The QTL generally acted additively and there was no evidence for epistasis. Consistent with the original line differences, broiler alleles had positive effects on body WFE and negative effects on AFE, whereas the phenotypic correlation between the two traits was positive. The mapped QTL for body WFE cumulatively accounted for almost half the body weight difference between the chicken lines at puberty. Overlapping QTL for body WFE and body weight to 9 weeks of age indicate that most QTL affecting growth rate also affect body WFE. The co-localisation of QTL for body weight, growth and sexual maturity suggests that body weight and growth rate are closely related to the attainment of sexual maturity and that the genetic determination of growth rate has correlated effects on puberty.