Lipoxygenases (LOXs) are a family of enzymes capable of peroxidizing phospholipids. A member of the LOX family of enzymes, 15-LOX, participates in the degradation of mitochondria and other organelles within differentiating red blood cells, the reticulocytes. The present study provides biochemical and immunocytochemical evidence for the presence of 15-LOX in the sperm cytoplasmic droplet (CD). Testicular, epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa were evaluated for the presence of 15-LOX using an affinity-purified immune serum raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C-terminal sequence of rabbit reticulocyte 15-LOX. Western blotting revealed an appropriate single band of ~81 kDa in boar spermatozoa but not in boar seminal plasma. When ejaculated boar spermatozoa were subjected to separation on a 45/90% Percoll gradient, 15-LOX co-migrated with the immotile sperm and cellular debris/CD fractions, but not with the motile sperm fraction containing morphologically normal spermatozoa without CDs. Varied levels of 15-LOX were expressed in ejaculated sperm samples from boars with varied semen quality. By immunofluorescence, prominent 15-LOX immunoreactivity was found within the residual body in the testis and within the CDs from caput, corpus and cauda epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa. Components of the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway, which is thought to facilitate both spermiogenesis and reticulocyte organelle degradation, were also detected in the sperm CD. These included ubiquitin, the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2, the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase PGP 9.5, and various 20S proteasomal core subunits of the α- and β-type. The 15-LOX and various components of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway were also detected in sperm CDs of other mammalian species, including the human, mouse, stallion and wild babirusa boar. We conclude that 15-LOX is prominently present in the mammalian sperm CD and thus may contribute to spermiogenesis, CD function or CD removal.
Spermatogenesis ensures the production of spermatozoa capable of acquiring progressive motility and the ability to recognize, bind to and fuse with an oocyte. This is achieved in part by the reduction of sperm cytoplasmic volume and organelle pool during spermiogenesis in the testis. The removal of the last portion of male germ cell cytoplasm, the sperm cytoplasmic droplet (CD), puts a final touch on the process of sperm morphogenesis. The sperm CD is composed of cytosol and organelle-derived membranes, which are thought to be the remnants of Golgi and possibly other spermatid organelles degraded during the final stages of spermiogenesis (Oko et al. 1993). The CD of mammalian spermatozoa is approximately 2 μm in diameter (Kaplan et al. 1984), and in most mammalian species is believed to be removed from the sperm midpiece during epididymal passage or after ejaculation. Although observed to a varied degree in most other mammals, CD retention on the sperm midpiece is the most frequent abnormality in ejaculated boar spermatozoa in boars of poor fertility. In this species, shed CDs accumulate in the ejaculate in the form of cellular debris. The presence of CDs either on the sperm midpiece (Waberski et al. 1994, Thundathil et al. 2001) or detached in the ejaculate (Aitken & Clarkson 1988) could reduce the fertilizing ability of the ejaculated boar spermatozoa. While the CDs retained on the sperm midpiece can be accounted for using conventional light-microscopical semen analysis, it is difficult to quantify the amount of free, detached CDs in boar semen. This presents a challenge in the swine industry, wherein over 70% of sows are bred using artificial insemination (National Animal Health Monitoring System Survey 2000), and mixing of ejaculates from several boars with varied sperm parameters is a common practice. It is thus desirable to identify new biomarkers that would allow development of an objective, automated assay for evaluation of total CD content in boar semen (reviewed by Althouse 1998).
Organelle degradation pathways were studied in detail during the differentiation of precursor red blood cells, the reticulocytes, in which the mitochondria, Golgi and other cellular organelles are abolished. The components of two distinct, synergistic pathways, the lipoxygenase (LOX) and the ubiquitin–proteasome pathways, were identified as major players in the process of reticulocyte organelle degradation. LOXs are a family of enzymes responsible for peroxidation of lipids such as arachidonic acid. 15-LOX has been shown to peroxidize lipids in organelle membranes during reticulocyte differentiation (Schewe et al. 1975). LOXs have also been implicated in the induction of sperm acrosomal exocytosis during mammalian fertilization (Oliw & Sprecher 1989, Lax et al. 1990). Ubiquitin, a small chaperone protein, is common to all eukaryotic cells and plays an important role in proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation. Ubiquitin is thought to facilitate proteolysis and organelle degradation during reticulocyte differentiation (Rapoport & Schewe 1986, Wefes et al. 1995). There is an indication that ubiquitin acts in synergy with the 15-LOX pathway during mitochondrial membrane degradation in the reticulocytes (Dubiel & Rapoport 1989, van Leyen et al. 1998). Although the respective LOX and ubiquitin pathways may not intersect directly, it is possible that they function in conjunction during organelle degradation. Similarly to reticulocyte differentiation, spermiogenesis relies in part on the ubiquitin system for organelle degradation and proteolysis (reviewed by Escalier 2003, Sutovsky 2003). Ubiquitin is also present in defective mammalian epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa (Sutovsky et al. 2001). Considering the requirement of ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis during spermatid elongation (Baarends et al. 1999, Escalier 2003, Sutovsky 2003), it is possible to envision a parallel relationship between 15-LOX and ubiquitin in reticulocyte maturation and spermatid elongation. Such synergy between the LOX and ubiquitin pathways could effectively release and degrade the respective lipid and protein components of spermatid organelle membranes without damaging the integrity of the spermatid plasma membrane. The present study provides direct biochemical and immunocytochemical evidence of 15-LOX expression in the spermatid residual body and the CD of epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa, consistent with a possible role of 15-LOX in spermiogenesis and epididymal sperm maturation.
Materials and Methods
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with approved Animal Care and Use Commitee protocols.
Boar semen samples
Boar ejaculates were obtained by the gloved-hand technique from crossbred and Large White boars at the University of Missouri swine farm. Eight boars used in the present studies had histories of varied sperm morphology and high and low frequency of CD retention. All boars were between 9 months and 2 years of age at the time of collection. Samples were collected as needed, with a minimum 3 day resting period between ejaculates and a maximum of 10 days between collections. Six other boars were used for sperm and tissue isolation from the testis and epididymis.
Epididymal and testicular spermatozoa
Boars from a commercial boar stud (n = 1) and the University of Missouri’s swine herd (n = 5) were killed following the approved ACUC protocols at the boar stud and the University of Missouri Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory respectively. Tissues (caput, corpus and cauda epididymis) from both the left and right side of the reproductive tract were collected. Sperm samples from all four compartments were obtained by repeated, gentle mincing of the tissue to allow sperm cells to flow into Sperm TL medium with polyvinyl pyrrolidone. Spermatozoa were passed through a 105 μm SpectraMesh macroporous filter (Spectrum Medical Industries, Inc., Houston, TX, USA) and centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min to collect a sperm pellet. The pellet was diluted with Sperm TL medium and sperm morphology was assessed (see Semen Evaluation subsection below).
High-resolution differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy was used for semen evaluation to attain high accuracy superior to that of routine field semen analysis, which typically employs microscopes with × 20 or × 40 magnification lenses and simple bright field illumination. Semen evaluation was always performed on fresh samples, never after freeze–thaw. Spermatozoa were photographed under DIC using a × 100 infinity-corrected planar apochromatic lens of a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope (Nikon, Inc., Melville, NY, USA) equipped with a CoolSnap HQ CCD device (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA) operated by MetaMorph software. Recorded images were evaluated on a 19 inch/48 cm, high-resolution, flat computer screen. At least 100 spermatozoa from each sample were randomly selected for morphological evaluation and classified as having a normal morphology, a proximal CD, a distal CD, or other type of abnormal morphology not due to the presence of a CD (sperm head and/or sperm tail malformations). While some authors believe that sperm CDs in epididymal or ejaculated spermatozoa may play a functional role in sperm maturation and migration, we considered all types of sperm CDs an abnormality in cauda epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa for the purpose of morphological evaluation. Spermatozoa were considered to have a proximal CD if the CD was present at the connecting piece or in the anterior half of the midpiece region. Spermatozoa were considered to have a distal CD if the CD was present at the annulus or in the posterior half of the midpiece region. Spermatozoa were considered to have other types of abnormal morphology if they had coiled tails, misshapen heads, misaligned head–midpiece connections or missing heads/tails.
Fresh semen samples were centrifuged at 500 g for 8 min. Seminal plasma was frozen at −20 °C and the sperm pellet was divided; one part of it stored at −20 °C and the other part fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 40 min on lysinecoated coverslips.
Semen fractionation on Percoll gradients
Raw, fresh sperm samples were liquefied and centrifuged at 500 g for 8 min to form a sperm pellet. A 45/90% discontinuous Percoll gradient was prepared using 2 ml 45% Percoll (1 ml 90% Percoll and 1 ml Sperm TL medium with BSA) and 2 ml 90% Percoll. One milliliter of the sperm pellet was carefully overlaid on top of the Percoll gradient and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 g. Spermatozoa were isolated from the individual fractions, and at least 100 spermatozoa per sample per fraction were randomly evaluated and classified according to parameters established (see Sperm Evaluation subsection above). Separated spermatozoa were washed twice through 8 ml protein-free Sperm TL medium with polyvinyl pyrrolidone at 500 g for 8 min. The sperm pellets were divided and either placed in a −20 °C freezer or fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 40 min on lysine-coated coverslips.
Rabbit anti-15-LOX serum was raised and affinity purified against a synthetic peptide corresponding to a C-terminal domain of rabbit reticulocyte 15-LOX (YLRPSIVENSVAI; van Leyen et al. 1998; diluted 1/100 for immunofluorescence, 1/2000 for Western blotting). Mouse antibodies were raised against human recombinant ubiquitin (KM691; Kamyia Biomedical, Seattle, WA, USA; diluted 1/100) and the rabbit serum against ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase PGP 9.5 (AB1761; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA; diluted 1/100). Rabbit ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 serum (diluted 1/100) and a proteasomal subunit antibody sampler (all diluted 1/100), containing rabbit immune sera recognizing the subunit MECL-1 and a number of other α- and β-type proteasomal 20S core subunits, were purchased from Affinity Research Ltd, Mammhead, UK, represented in the US by Biomol (Ply-mouth Meeting, PA, USA). Mouse anti-β-tubulin IgG E7 for Western blotting controls was purchased from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, maintained by the University of Iowa, IA, USA.
Secondary antibodies used in these experiments were: goat anti-rabbit conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate or tetramethyl-rhodamine isothiocyanate (GAR IgG-FITC and GAR IgG-TRITC respectively; Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA, diluted 1/80) and goat anti-rabbit conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (GAR IgG-HRP; Zymed, Lot 00962107, diluted 1/10 000). Where applicable, DNA was counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride, diluted 1/80).
Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry
Coverslips with spermatozoa fixed fresh on poly-l-lysine coverslips were permeabilized using PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 40 min and washed in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sutovsky P et al. 2004). Anti-15-LOX antibody (see Antibodies subsection above) was diluted in 1% NGS in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and added to spermatozoa for 40 min. After washing in 1% NGS in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100, the secondary antibody, GAR IgG-FITC, and DAPI were diluted in 1% NGS in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and added to the coverslips for 1 h. Negative controls were performed by incubation with pre-immune rabbit serum (diluted 1/100), followed by GAR IgG-FITC or GAR IgG-TRITC. Immunohistochemistry on boar testicular and epididymal paraffin tissue sections was performed using a standard protocol (Sutovsky et al. 2001) and probes, reagents and conditions described above. Images were acquired using a CoolSnap HQ CCD camera (Roper Scientific) operated by Meta-Morph software (Universal Imaging Corp., Downington, PA, USA), using appropriate epifluorescence filters on a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. Images were printed using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Sperm proteins were extracted from frozen sperm samples by adding an extraction buffer containing 50 mM Tris–HCl, 20 mM imidazole, 1 m MEDTA, 1 mM phenyl-methylsulfonyl fluoride, Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma; lot #102K41) and 5 mM benzamidine HCl (pH 6.0) to the sperm sample (2 vol/vol). The sperm solution was ground at maximum speed for 3.5 min using a pestle attached to a 9.6V electric drill (Black and Decker; model no. CD9600). Samples were centrifuged in a cooled microcentrifuge at 4 °C at 16 000 g for 60 min. Standard Bradford protein estimation was performed using a Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at 595 nm wavelength absorbance. In some experiments, protein standardization was confirmed by Western blotting with anti-β-tubulin antibody E7 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa). Samples were boiled for 5 min with 2% SDS, 20% glycerin, 0.05% bromphenol blue and 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and electrophoretically separated on a 10% Tris–glycine gel (BioWhittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, ME, USA) using 19–30 μg protein per sample lane. Kaleidoscope Prestained Standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories) were used as the molecular mass marker. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilon-P Transfer Membranes; Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA) using a wet transfer system (Model #VEP-2; Owl Scientific, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). Blots were blocked for 17–30 h using Blocker Casein in PBS solution (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Anti-15-LOX (diluted 1/2000, see Antibodies subsection above) was added to 0.25% Tris base saline (TBS)–Tween 20 and then incubated with the membrane for 18–28 h. Blots were washed three times in 0.25% TBS–Tween 20 and then incubated for 1 h in GAR IgG-HRP. The membrane was washed three times in 0.25% TBS–Tween 20 and incubated with SuperSignalWest Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce). Kodak BioMax Light Film were exposed and developed by using a Kodak M35A X-OMAT Processor. Negative controls were performed using nonimmune rabbit serum.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from 10–30 mg frozen boar testicular and caput, corpus and cauda epididymal tissues or 1.5 ml boar blood using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). DNase digestion was used with an RNase Free DNase Set from Qiagen, according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The RNA samples were quantified with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) at 260 nm and amplified by a two-step RT-PCR using Oligo-dT primer(15n) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in the first step of cDNA synthesis. A Qiagen Sensiscript RT-PCR kit was used for the RT-PCR reaction; 20 μl RT mix were incubated at 37 °C for 90 min. Two microliters of RT-PCR products were used for PCR with gene-specific primers designed to span intron regions, to eliminate false-positive PCR fragments generated from genomic DNA. The primer sequences based on Sus scrofa 15-LOX mRNA sequence, Gene bank accession number NM_213931 were: forward primer 5′-GAAGCTGTATCGGTGGGGTA-3′ (Tm 57 °C), reverse primer 5′-GCCACACCAGAAAATCCTGT-3′ (Tm 57 °C). The PCR reactions were performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler (Eppendorf/Brinkmann, Westbury, NY, USA) using an Eppendorf Hot Start PCR kit and 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers. The PCR initially started at 94 °C for 2 min denaturation, followed by 38 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 57 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 25 s. Final extension was at 65 °C for 2 min. The PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gel, stained with 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide, and photographed on top of a UV light box. The PCR products were sequenced by an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer using Applied Biosystems Prism BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The resultant sequences matched the Sus scrofa 15-LOX mRNA sequence from gene bank.
Semen samples from eight boars of varied fertility, examined by Western blotting with a peptide-specific anti-15-LOX serum, displayed varied quantities of 15-LOX, as determined by variable density of a single band of ~81 kDa (Fig. 1A). This 15-LOX immunoreactivity was mainly contributed by spermatozoa, as the isolated seminal plasma did not display the 81 kDa or other LOX immunoreactive bands (Fig. 1B). The lack of bands in the negative control indicated the specificity of the antisera (Fig. 1C). The above immune serum recognizes sperm CDs in wild-type mice but not in mutant mice lacking the functional 15-LOX gene (Sutovsky P & Lovercamp KW; unpublished observations). Expression of the 15-LOX gene in both testis and epididymis was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 1D) and direct sequencing of the amplified product.
To determine whether the 15-LOX immunoreactivity was restricted to CDs or contributed by other sperm components, boar ejaculates were separated on a discontinuous 45/90% Percoll gradient (Fig. 2A and B), resulting in fractions containing separated droplets (45% supernatant), defective spermatozoa with or without retained CDs (45–90% interface fraction), and normal, motile spermatozoa without CDs (90% pellet). While the 90% pellet fraction was free of 15-LOX, the other two fractions displayed a single, 15-LOX-immunoreactive band of similar density (Fig. 2A). The localization of 15-LOX to the CD alone was confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3A–D) and was not observed in sperm samples incubated with pre-immune rabbit serum and an appropriate secondary antibody (Fig. 3I). Interestingly, the components of the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway were also detected in boar sperm CDs, including ubiquitin (Fig. 3E), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (Fig. 3F), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase PGP 9.5 (Fig. 3G), and proteasomal core subunits of types α and β (Fig. 3H; subunit MECL-1/β2i is shown; other proteasomal subunit data not shown). The expression of 15-LOX and its retention in the sperm CD appeared to be conserved as it was also detected in the African wild babyrusa boar (Babyrousa babyrussa; Fig. 3J), human (Fig. 3K), stallion (Fig. 3L), and mouse testicular and epididymal spermatozoa (Fig. 3M and N). The components of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, as listed above, were also present in the CDs of these other species (data not shown).
Western blotting confirmed the presence of 15-LOX in the spermatozoa isolated from the testis and epididymis (Fig. 4A). Light-microscopic evaluation of the presence of CDs on caput, corpus, and cauda epididymal spermatozoa of six individual boars revealed that the CDs gradually moved from the proximal to distal position during the passage between the caput and cauda epididymis (Fig. 4B). On average, more than 70% of cauda epididymal spermatozoa still contained distal CDs (Fig. 4B; the least square means for six boars are shown).
A boar with a high incidence (an average of 49.8% in five collections) of abnormal spermatozoa in ejaculates including, but not limited to, sperm-borne proximal and distal CDs, was identified in the course of the present studies. The boar was killed, and the testicular and epididymal spermatozoa from both sides of its reproductive tract were isolated and analyzed by light microscopy (Fig. 5A). Light microscopic sperm analysis determined that the right side of this boar’s reproductive tract produced a significantly higher percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa (abnormalities other than proximal or distal CDs) than the left side (Fig. 5A). While the sampling of spermatozoa from the left and right epididymis showed the migration of CDs to the distal position during epididymal passage, cauda epididymal spermatozoa on the right side still contained 20% of spermatozoa with gross morphological abnormalities other than distal CD retention (which is expected in ~70% of the cauda epididymal spermatozoa in boar) (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, it appeared that the percentage of other visible morphological anomalies, while fairly constant on the unaffected left side, was reduced by half between caput and cauda epididymis on the right side (Fig. 5A). This observation indicates the epididymis has the capability to actively remove defective spermatozoa. Corresponding testicular and epididymal tissue samples from this boar were analyzed for the presence of 15-LOX by immunohistochemistry. Seminiferous tubule degeneration accompanied by the increased accumulation of 15-LOX in the cytoplasmic lobes of elongated spermatids (Fig. 5C) was revealed by immunohistochemistry of the right testis while normal immunoreactivity of 15-LOX was seen in the left testis (Fig. 5B). Epididymal tissues from both sides (Fig. 5D and E) showed slight accumulation of 15-LOX in the cytoplasm of epididymal epithelial cells, and mainly on the apical surface of the epididymal epithelium, the site of both endocytosis and apocrine secretion of epididymal proteins. Such epididymal 15-LOX immunoreactivity, representative of epididymal tissues of the other five boars examined (not shown), was not observed in epididymal and testicular tissue sections incubated with pre-immune rabbit serum and appropriate secondary antibodies (Fig. 5F and G).
It is widely recognized that the CD migrates from the proximal to the distal position on the midpiece of the mammalian spermatozoa during sperm passage through the epididymis. In the present study, boar sperm CDs pre-vailed in a proximal position in the caput epididymis and then traveled down the midpiece of the spermatozoa between the caput and corpus epididymis. It is not clear when CDs are removed in the boar. Briz et al.(1995) reported droplet removal in the epididymis, while Harayama et al.(1996) suggested that components of seminal plasma, such as fructose or cAMP, might facilitate the completion of shedding of CDs from boar spermatozoa after ejaculation. The successful removal of CDs from porcine spermatozoa may result from the synergy of the above mechanisms, but may also involve contributions from other pathways including the LOX and ubiquitin systems.
In this study, 15-LOX was found in the residual bodies rejected by elongating spermatids, and in the CDs of epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa. 15-LOX was strongly associated with the fractions of the Percoll gradient that contained a large percentage of CDs, regardless of whether they were attached to the spermatozoa in the immotile sperm fraction or free in the debris fraction. The 15-LOX was not associated with normal, motile spermatozoa. This indicates that samples with a larger percentage of CD retention on spermatozoa or in the debris fraction of the seminal plasma have stronger immunoreactivity to 15-LOX and 15-LOX is not abundant in motile spermatozoa without CDs.
In reticulocytes, 15-LOX is thought to be present both in the organelle membranes and on the inner face of the plasma membrane (Kühn et al. 1990). However, recent papers (van Leyen et al. 1998, Grüllich et al. 2001) have indicated that 15-LOX is present predominantly in reticulocyte organelle membranes, although some binding to the plasma membrane could be detected. Similarly to reticulocytes, the sperm CD contains organelle remnants destined for degradation, and the CD itself must be removed from a spermatozoon to eventually undergo degradation. The plasma membrane of the CD may become less rigid in structure after it has matured in the epididymis. Such a weakened plasma membrane on the mature CD may be prone to degradation, allowing 15-LOX substrates to be exposed that are normally protected in a non-damaged, immature CD plasma membrane. Similarly, isolated, processed plasma membranes used in studies described above may have exposed 15-LOX substrates due to processing. The 15-LOX enzyme could thus efficiently peroxidize both organelle membranes inside the CD and the plasma membrane of the CD without damaging the sperm plasma membranes and membranes of the sperm mitochondrial capsule. In future experiments, specific inhibitors of 15-LOX activity could be used in an attempt to halt CD removal from isolated caput epididymal spermatozoa in an in vitro system.
While the presence of 15-LOX may contribute to the degradation of organelle membrane lipids in the CD, the mechanism for the degradation of the protein component of CD organelle membranes remains to be explained. The present data and a recent report by Kuster et al.(2004) support a model in which the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway acts in synergy with the 15-LOX pathway for the degradation of the CD. This synergy could be similar to the respective contributions of the 15-LOX (van Leyen et al. 1998) and ubiquitin (Dubiel & Rapoport 1989) pathways to reticulocyte organelle degradation. In the proposed model for organelle membrane degradation inside sperm CDs, the 15-LOX releases and/or degrades the lipid membrane components of the organelles in the CD and the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway is responsible for targeting the protein components of the CD for proteolytic degradation. Structurally altered by the respective activities of the 15-LOX and ubiquitin–proteasome pathways, the CD could descend from the connecting piece to the annulus, finally culminating in its release from the sperm axoneme to be liquefied and phagocytosed by the clear cells of the epididymal epithelium (Hermo et al. 1988) or rejected after ejaculation. Alternatively, 15-LOX could participate in epididymal sperm maturation and particularly in the morphogenesis of the sperm tail midpiece and mitochondrial sheath. We are currently investigating epididymal sperm maturation in a mutant mouse lacking the 15-LOX gene (ALOX mouse; Sun & Funk 1996). Although the ALOX males are not infertile, our preliminary data indicate reduced sperm quality and altered CD migration (K W Lovercamp and P Sutovsky, unpublished observations).
Although in vitro fertilization trials were not performed for the present study, it should be considered that the 15-LOX from superfluous CDs in boar seminal plasma could reduce the fertilizing potential of motile spermatozoa without CDs. A negative effect of infertile bull spermatozoa with retained CDs on normal bull spermatozoa was shown during bovine fertilization in vitro (Thundathil et al. 2001). In boars, the proportion of spermatozoa with distal CDs in an ejaculate had a negative correlation with pregnancy rates and litter size (Waberski et al. 1994). The accumulation of rejected CDs in semen could affect fertility directly by reducing sperm motility, or indirectly by releasing active enzymes and reactive oxygen species into seminal plasma (Aitken & Clarkson 1988). Similarly, the soluble 15-LOX in semen could cause premature acrosomal exocytosis (Oliw & Sprecher 1989, Lax et al. 1990), thus interfering with the process of sperm–zona binding and zona penetration. Altogether, the present study demonstrates that 15-LOX is a prominent enzymatic component of the sperm CD. It is to be determined if the 15-LOX present in the CD of boar spermatozoa is responsible for the degradation of CD organelle membranes and/or the removal of CDs from spermatozoa. Further studies will be pursued to determine the value of 15-LOX as an objective, quantitative marker of boar sperm quality by virtue of detecting differential amounts of 15-LOX in individual boar semen, thus reflecting the amount of both sperm-bound and free seminal CDs.
Received 10 January 2005 First decision 18 March 2005 Revised manuscript received 14 April 2005 Accepted 23 May 2005
We thank Karen Bauman (Saint Louis Zoo) for providing babyrusa pig tissues, Dr Steve Terlouw and Brian Rojas (Premium Standard Farms) for domestic boar tissue and semen samples and Heinz Leigh for providing technical assistance. This work was supported by the USDA-NRI, Animal Reproduction Program (P S; award #2002-02069), Food for the 21st Century Program of the University of Missouri-Columbia (P S), and the Agricultural Experimental Station, University of Missouri-Columbia funding (T S). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.
National Animal Health Monitoring System Survey2000 Part A: Reference of Swine health and management in the United States. In USDA National Animal Health Monitoring System. Fort Collins USDA.