Abstract
The study was designed to test the hypothesis that aging in cattle is associated with reduced developmental competence of oocytes. The hypothesis was tested by comparing embryo production and pregnancy rates between 13- to 16-year-old cows (n = 6 in Year 1 and n = 9 in Year 2) and their 3- to 6-year-old young daughters (n = 8 in Year 1 and n = 9 in Year 2) after superovulation and transfer of embryos into an unrelated group of young recipients. Embryos were transferred into 2- to 5-year-old recipient cows (n = 99) as singletons (n = 45) or in pairs (n = 54 pairs). Embryo survival in recipients was determined by ultrasonography and by the number of calves born. Between old versus young cows, the number of ovulations (31 ± 4 vs 38 ± 3; P = 0.2) and the number of corpora lutea (25 ± 3 vs 29 ± 2; P = 0.3) did not differ, but fewer (P = 0.04) embryos were recovered from old cows (6 ± 2) than their daughters (12 ± 2). A higher proportion (P < 0.0001) of unfertilized oocytes/uncleaved zygotes were recovered from old cows (222/312, 71%) than their daughters (119/316, 38%). Among the embryos recovered, the proportion of International Embryo Transfer Society Grades 1–2 embryos was similar (P = 0.9) between old (59/90, 66%) and young cows (130/194, 67%). The survival of embryos after transfer into recipients, and the proportion of calves born were also similar between old and young cows. In conclusion, recovery of fewer embryos and a greater proportion of unfertilized oocytes/uncleaved zygotes suggest reduced developmental competence of oocytes from old cows, but there was no difference between age groups in embryo survival after the morula/blastocyst stage.
Introduction
Demographic analyses of monogamous populations that did not practice contraception revealed that fertility in women decreased with age (Tietze 1957, Menken et al. 1986). However, these findings were confounded by decreased sexual activity with age, reproductive pathology associated with multiparity, and male infertility (Menken et al. 1986). These confounding variables were abrogated in a later retrospective study of 2193 nulliparous women, whose husbands were sterile and, who were artificially inseminated for 12 consecutive menstrual cycles using semen from fertile donors (Schwartz & Mayaux 1982). Pregnancy rate in the women over 35 years of age was significantly lower (54%) than in the women below 31 years of age (74%). The results of more recent demographic studies (Chandra et al. 2005) and the national results of assisted reproductive technologies (Wright et al. 2006) substantiate the phenomenon of an age-related decline in female fertility.
Endocrine studies in older women demonstrated higher circulating concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) when compared with younger women (Klein et al. 1996, Soules et al. 2001), attributed to reduced negative feedback as a result of lower circulating concentrations of inhibin B (Klein et al. 2004). Older women using assisted reproductive technologies to become pregnant also had lower ovarian follicular response to gonadotropin stimulation than younger women, and embryos derived from oocytes of older women had lower implantation rates after transfer (Anonymous 2004). Studies involving oocyte donation from younger to older women are supportive of the notion that the age-related decline in fertility is due to reduced developmental competence of oocytes and not due to differences in uterine receptivity in women of advanced age (Sauer 1998). Oocyte chromosomal abnormalities, spindle defects, and reduced mitochondrial function have been implicated in the age-related decline in fertility (Pellestor et al. 2003, Baird et al. 2005), but the mechanisms are not well understood. Research progress has been limited because oocytes from women cannot be obtained for hypothesis-based interventional studies, and most of the previous observations were made on oocytes that failed to develop into embryos after assisted reproductive cycles. Moreover, there is a lack of a well-characterized animal model to study reproductive aging in women.
We proposed a bovine model to study the ovarian function and the age-associated decline in fertility in women (Adams & Pierson 1995, Malhi et al. 2005). As with women, the majority of inter-ovulatory intervals in cattle are composed of either two or three waves of follicular development (Ginther et al. 1989, Adams 1999, Baerwald et al. 2003a, 2003b). Furthermore mechanisms of follicular wave emergence, selection of a dominant follicle, and ovulation were fundamentally similar (Adams & Pierson 1995, Baerwald et al. 2003b). Age-related follicular and endocrine changes during a natural inter-ovulatory interval have been documented in 13- to 14-year-old cows, and were compared with their 1- to 4-year-old daughters (Malhi et al. 2005). Old cows had elevated circulating concentrations of FSH (Malhi et al. 2005) similar to that of women (Klein et al. 1996). The follicular wave pattern in older animals was similar to that of their young daughters (Malhi et al. 2005). Old cows had fewer 4 to 5 mm follicles recruited into a follicular wave (Malhi et al. 2005), and had fewer large follicles after ovarian superstimulation (Malhi et al. 2006) when compared with their young daughters. The same groups of old and young cows were used for the present study.
The study was designed to test the hypothesis that aging in cattle is associated with reduced developmental competence of oocytes. We tested the hypothesis by comparing old cows and their young daughters in the: (1) proportion of oocytes and embryos recovered after superovulation, artificial insemination, and non-surgical uterine flushing and (2) pregnancy rate and calves born after transfer of embryos into an unrelated group of young recipient cows.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted at the Goodale Research Farm, University of Saskatchewan, Canada (52° N and 106° W) during the months of May and June in two consecutive years. Groups of crossbred Hereford cows (13- to 16-year-old, n = 6 in Year 1 and n = 9 in Year 2) and their young daughters (3- to 6-year-old, n = 8 in Year 1 and n = 9 in Year 2) were used as embryo donors. All cows were maintained together in an outdoor corral. Embryo donors were divided into three to four replicates in both years, but mother–daughter pairs were kept in the same replicate to minimize inter-replicate variation between age groups. An unrelated group of young crossbred Hereford cows (2- to 5-year-old, n = 32 in Year 1 and n = 67 in Year 2) were used as embryo recipients. The recipient cows were assigned to replicates based on age and body weight to minimize inter-replicate variability, and was maintained in outdoor corrals adjacent to the donors. All donor and recipient cows were at least 45 days postpartum, nonlactating, nonpregnant, and had a corpus luteum at the beginning of the study. The experimental protocol was approved by the University Committee on Animal Care and Supply under guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
Embryo donors
The emergence of a new follicular wave was induced using a combined treatment of estradiol-17β (5 mg; Catalog no. E8875, Sigma) and progesterone (100 mg; Catalog no. P0130, Sigma) given i.m. at random stages of the estrous cycle (Malhi et al. 2005, 2006). An intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (1.9 g progesterone; CIDR-B, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) was inserted at the time of steroid treatment. Ovarian superstimulatory treatment was initiated at the time of expected follicle wave emergence (i.e. 4 days after estradiol/progesterone treatment (Bo et al. 1994, Mapletoft et al. 2002)), using an i.m. dose of 6.25 mg NIH-FSH-P1 FSH/100 kg body weight/cow twice daily for 4 days i.e. a total dose of 50 mg Folltropin-V/100 kg body weight/cow (Bioniche Animal Health). On the last day of FSH treatment, a luteolytic dose of cloprostenol (500 μg Estrumate, Schering-Plough Animal health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada) was given i.m. in the morning and evening, and the CIDR-B was removed at the time of the second cloprostenol treatment. An ovulatory dose of porcine luteinizing hormone (LH; 25 mg Armor standard, Lutropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health) was given i.m. 24 h after the second cloprostenol treatment. Cows were artificially inseminated 12 and 24 h after LH treatment by one inseminator using frozen semen of the same ejaculate of a single bull. Cows with unovulated follicles detected 12 h after the second insemination were inseminated again.
Daily transrectal ovarian ultrasound examinations were done by one operator using a B-mode ultrasound scanner with a 7.5 MHz linear array transducer (Aloka SSD-900, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) to record follicular development and ovulations, beginning at the time of estradiol/progesterone treatment. Follicle numbers in the 2–5 mm and ≥6 mm diameter categories were counted during each examination. The number of ovulations was estimated by the disappearance of follicles 6 mm or greater recorded during the previous ultrasound examination. The follicles of 6–8 mm diameter category were included in order to minimize the likelihood of missing any ovulations.
Oocytes and embryos were recovered 7 days after the first insemination by nonsurgical uterine flushing using Vigro complete flushing medium (Bioniche Animal Health). Two experienced operators performed all embryo collections, but each mother–daughter pair was flushed by the same operator to minimize within-pair variation. The recovered embryos were graded by a single experienced embryo transfer (ET) practitioner based on the morphological classification of International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS; Stringfellow & Seidel 1998). Unfertilized oocytes were not distinguished from uncleaved zygotes as sperm penetration could not be evaluated reliably 7 days after insemination. Ovarian ultrasound examination of donor animals was also performed on the day of embryo collection to count the number of corpora lutea.
Embryo recipients
Follicular wave emergence was synchronized using estradiol-17β, progesterone, and CIDR-B treatment, as described for donor cows (Malhi et al. 2005, 2006), except that the recipients were treated 1 day before the donors. A luteolytic dose of cloprostenol (500 μg Estrumate, Schering-Plough Animal health) was given i.m. at the time of CIDR removal, on the evening of the 7th day after estradiol/progesterone treatment. Recipients were given a second i.m. dose of estradiol-17β (1 mg in canola oil) 24 h after cloprostenol treatment and CIDR-B removal to synchronize the preovulatory LH surge and ovulation (Malhi et al. 2006).
Embryo transfers
Embryos were transferred transcervically into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum by one experienced operator. In Year 1, most of the embryos were transferred as pairs i.e. 56 embryos into 28 recipients. Four embryos were transferred as singletons. In Year 2, 52 embryos were transferred as pairs into 26 recipients, and 41 embryos were transferred as singletons. Most of the embryos transferred were of IETS Grades 1 and 2, but three Grade 3 embryos were also transferred.
Embryo survival/loss
Embryo survival/loss in recipient animals was determined by transrectal ultrasonographic examination 28–30 days and again 45–48 days after donor insemination, and by the number of calves born.
Data analysis
Ovulation, corpus luteum, and oocyte/embryo recovery data were compared between old and young cows by Student’s t-test. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined between the number of ovulations and corpora lutea using the correlation procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS for windows version 9.1.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The proportional data on oocyte/embryo recovery and embryo survival were compared between old and young cows by χ2 analysis or Fisher’s Exact test using the frequency procedure of SAS. A probability value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The superstimulatory dose of FSH, the number of ovulations and corpora lutea in both Year 1 and Year 2 did not differ between old cows and their young daughters (Table 1). A separate analysis was performed to compare data from Years 1 to 2; the dose of FSH (P = 0.5), numbers of ovulations (P = 0.3), corpora lutea (P = 0.2), total oocyte/embryo recovered (P = 0.7) were not different, and thus the data from Years 1 to 2 were combined (Table 1). When data were combined between age groups and years, there was a significant correlation (r = 0.85, P < 0.0001) between the number of ovulations and corpora lutea detected by ultrasonography.
Inability to catheterize the cervix of one young daughter in Year 2 precluded uterine flushing; hence, her data were not included in analysis of oocyte/embryo recovery rate. The total number of oocytes plus embryos recovered did not differ between old cows and their daughters (Table 1). When combined over both years, there were significantly (P = 0.04) higher mean number of oocytes, and fewer mean number of embryos recovered from old cows than their daughters (Table 1). When oocyte and embryo data from all animals of each age group were combined, a higher proportion of oocytes and a lower proportion of embryos were recovered from old cows than their young daughters (P < 0.0001, Fig. 1A). Among the recovered embryos, the proportion of Grades 1 and 2 embryos did not differ (P > 0.5) between old cows and their young daughters (Fig. 1B).
The mean of proportion of oocytes collected at the time of embryo recovery per cow was higher (P = 0.05) in old cows (66 ± 9%, n = 15) than in their young daughters (41 ± 8%, n = 16). Two old cows in Years 1 and 2, and two young cows in Year 1 produced only oocytes, no embryos. When data from these cows were excluded from the analysis, the mean proportion of oocytes tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in old cows (54 ± 10%, n = 11) than in their young daughters (33 ± 7%, n = 14). A higher proportion (P = 0.03) of old cows (10/15; 67%) had > 50% oocytes collected, of the total oocytes/embryos recovered, than their young daughters (4/16; 25%).
The survival of embryos in young recipients after transfer from young and old cows is summarized in Fig. 2. The survival of embryos obtained from old cows versus their young daughters did not differ. The survival of embryos transferred into recipient cows as singletons versus pairs also did not differ, when combined between age groups and years (Fig. 3). Pregnancy losses after 28 days post-insemination did not differ between old and young cows (7/24; 29% vs 10/49; 20% respectively; Fig. 2), when combined for both years. However, fetal loss between 45 days post-insemination and calving tended to be higher (P = 0.08) in old cows than their young daughters (6/23; 26% vs, 4/43; 9% respectively; Fig. 2).
Discussion
The present experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that aging in cattle is associated with reduced developmental competence of oocytes. Retrospective analyses of demographic records have documented a decline in fertility in women > 35 years of age (Tietze 1957, Menken et al. 1986, Chandra et al. 2005). In addition, the success rates of donor insemination, in vitro fertilization and ET (IVF-ET) in women also decreased with age (Schwartz & Mayaux 1982, Hull et al. 1996, Dew et al. 1998, Wright et al. 2006). Following ovarian superstimulation for assisted reproduction, fewer oocytes were recovered, the embryo implantation rate after IVF-ET was lower, gestational attrition was higher, and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was greater in women > 35 years of age than in younger women (Hull et al. 1996, Spandorfer et al. 2004). Higher circulating concentrations of FSH have also been observed with advancing age in women (Klein et al. 1996, Soules et al. 2001), but the mechanisms involved in the age-related decline in fertility are not well understood, and there is a lack of a well-characterized animal model to study reproductive aging.
A bovine model to study ovarian function in women has been proposed (Adams & Pierson 1995), and was the basis of the discovery of follicular waves in women (Baerwald et al. 2003a, 2003b). Follicular and endocrine events of the normal reproductive cycle; i.e. follicular wave emergence, follicle selection, and ovulation, were fundamentally similar between cattle and women (Adams et al. 1992, Adams & Pierson 1995, Baerwald et al. 2003a, 2003b). The first sign of reproductive aging in women was a rise in circulating concentrations of FSH (Klein et al. 1996). A similar rise in circulating FSH was also detected in aging cows (13- to 14-year-old; Malhi et al. 2005). Fewer small ovarian follicles at the time of follicle wave emergence, and fewer large follicles after ovarian superstimulation were also observed in the same group of aged cattle when compared with their young daughters (Malhi et al. 2006). In a previous study (Burns et al. 2005), young dairy cows with lower numbers of ≥3 mm follicles in a follicular wave had elevated circulating concentrations of FSH than cows in same age group but with higher number of follicles. Based on these findings, we proposed a bovine model for the study of oocyte-associated subfertility in women of advanced age (Malhi et al. 2005).
In an early herd-based study, about half of the cows were infertile by 13 years of age (Erickson et al. 1976). Therefore, we chose 13- to 16-year-old cows to test our hypothesis, while their 3- to 6-year-old young daughters were used for comparisons. It is noteworthy that old cows in the present study were selected for fertility i.e. other cows in the same herd that failed to produce a calf annually were culled. Age-related follicular and endocrine changes during a natural inter-ovulatory interval were documented previously in the same groups of animals (Malhi et al. 2005). To test the stated hypothesis, data from old cows and their young daughters were analyzed by comparing 1) the actual number of recovered oocytes/embryos, 2) the proportion of total oocytes/embryos recovered in each age group, 3) the proportion of oocytes/embryos recovered from each individual, and 4) the pregnancy rate and number of calves born after transfer of embryos recovered from old and young cows into an unrelated group of young recipients. The recovery of fewer embryos and a higher proportion of oocytes collected from aged cattle, when compared with their young daughters, suggest that fertilization or cleavage rates decline with age. This conclusion is supported by the observation that of the total oocytes/embryos recovered per cow, significantly more numbers of old cows (10/15, 67%) produced > 50% oocytes when compared with their young daughters (4/16; 25%).
Although the experiment was not designed to directly test gamete transport among age groups, oviductal transport of oocytes/embryos was similar (P = 0.11) between age groups based on the number of oocytes/ embryos recovered as a proportion of detected ovulations (66 ± 6% in old cows and 53 ± 6% in young daughters). Analysis of oocyte/embryo recovery by including data from only those animals that produced at least two or more embryos (i.e. confirming the presence of spermatozoa in the oviducts) revealed a higher (P = 0.05) proportion of oocytes and uncleaved zygotes in old cows (50 ± 10%, n = 10) than in their daughters (28 ± 5%, n = 13).
In a retrospective analysis of data from commercial embryo transfers in Holstein cows (Lerner et al. 1986), a significant decrease in fertilization rate was also observed with advancing age, consistent with the findings of the present study. In another study (Fujino et al. 1996), ovulated oocytes recovered from the oviducts of aged mice had a lower fertilization rate in vitro (determined by counting zygotes at the two-cell stage) when compared with those from young mice. Contradictory results have been obtained from IVF studies in women; some reported reduced fertilization/ cleavage rates in women > 40 years of age (Ashkenazi et al. 1996, Dew et al. 1998), while others reported that fertilization/cleavage rates in older women were similar to that in younger women (Hull et al. 1996, Janny & Menezo 1996, Lim & Tsakok 1997, Klein & Sauer 2001).
In the present study, fewer embryos were recovered from old Hereford-cross cows than their young daughters, consistent with the results of a study of Holstein cows (Lerner et al. 1986) in which the number of transferable embryos also decreased with advanced age. In an equine study (Carnevale & Ginther 1995), fewer pregnancies were detected after intrafallopian transfer of oocytes from old versus young mares into young recipient mares (detected by ultrasonography 12 days after transfer and insemination). Interestingly, however, the proportion of Grades 1 and 2 embryos, out of the total number of embryos recovered in the present study, did not differ between old and young cows. As well, the survival of embryos obtained from old cows and their young daughters after transfer (as singletons or pairs) into young recipients did not differ between age groups. Similarly, age did not influence pregnancy rate after embryo transfer in Holstein cattle (Lerner et al. 1986). On the contrary, the implantation/pregnancy rate in women after embryo transfer decreased with age of the embryo donor (Hull et al. 1996, Lim & Tsakok 1997). However, it is common practice to transfer embryos immediately after cleavage in women (i.e. not cultured to blastocyst stage; Blake et al. 2005). In the present study, pregnancy loss did not differ between embryos transferred from old versus young cows.
The hypothesis that developmental competence of oocytes declines with maternal age was supported; a lower proportion of embryos and a higher proportion of oocytes/uncleaved zygotes were recovered from old cows when compared with their young daughters. Failure of fertilization or cleavage suggests that development is impaired at a very early stage in oocytes derived from old cows. Although fewer embryos were produced from the old cows, the proportion of good quality embryos recovered, and the survival of good quality embryos after transfer into young recipients was similar between age groups. In conclusion, fertilization/cleavage rates were lower in oocytes from old cows than in their young daughters, but those that reached morula/ blastocyst stage of development had similar developmental potential.
Ovarian superstimulatory dose of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and the superovulatory response in old cows (13- to 16-year-old) and their young daughters (3- to 6-year-old). The values are expressed in mean ± S.E.M.
| Old cows | Young daughters | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| aIncludes unfertilized oocytes and zygotes that did not cleave. | |||
| Total FSH dose in mg NIH-FSH-P1 units | |||
| Year 1 | 381 ± 15 (n = 6) | 388 ± 16 (n = 8) | 0.8 |
| Year 2 | 360 ± 9 (n = 9) | 387 ± 24 (n = 9) | 0.3 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 368 ± 8 (n = 15) | 387 ± 14 (n = 17) | 0.3 |
| Numbers of ovulations detected by ultrasonography | |||
| Year 1 | 30 ± 5 (n = 6) | 33 ± 2 (n = 8) | 0.5 |
| Year 2 | 32 ± 6 (n = 9) | 43 ± 5 (n = 9) | 0.1 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 31 ± 4 (n = 15) | 38 ± 3 (n = 17) | 0.2 |
| Numbers of corpora lutea on the day of embryo recovery | |||
| Year 1 | 23 ± 3 (n = 6) | 25 ± 1 (n = 8) | 0.5 |
| Year 2 | 26 ± 5 (n = 9) | 32 ± 4 (n = 9) | 0.1 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 25 ± 3 (n = 15) | 29 ± 2 (n = 17) | 0.3 |
| Oocyte and embryo recovery | |||
| Year 1 | 22 ± 5 (n = 6) | 17 ± 4 (n = 8) | 0.5 |
| Year 2 | 20 ± 5 (n = 9) | 23 ± 3 (n = 8) | 0.7 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 21 ± 4 (n = 15) | 20 ± 3 (n = 16) | 0.8 |
| Embryo recovery | |||
| Year 1 | 4 ± 2 (n = 6) | 9 ± 3 (n = 8) | 0.2 |
| Year 2 | 7 ± 3 (n = 9) | 16 ± 4 (n = 8) | 0.08 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 6 ± 2 (n = 15) | 12 ± 2 (n = 16) | 0.04 |
| Oocyte recoverya | |||
| Year 1 | 18 ± 5 (n = 6) | 8 ± 2 (n = 8) | 0.07 |
| Year 2 | 12 ± 4 (n = 9) | 7 ± 2 (n = 8) | 0.2 |
| Years 1 and 2 combined | 15 ± 3 (n = 15) | 7 ± 2 (n = 16) | 0.04 |
Numbers of oocytes and embryos collected (A) and the relative proportions of embryos by IETS Grade (B) from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Numbers of oocytes and embryos collected (A) and the relative proportions of embryos by IETS Grade (B) from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Numbers of oocytes and embryos collected (A) and the relative proportions of embryos by IETS Grade (B) from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Survival of embryos recovered from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2) after transfer to recipient cows (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination (A), 45–48 days post-insemination (B), and by live-born calves (C).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Survival of embryos recovered from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2) after transfer to recipient cows (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination (A), 45–48 days post-insemination (B), and by live-born calves (C).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Survival of embryos recovered from old cows (n = 6 and 9 in Years 1 and 2 respectively) and their young daughters (n = 8 in each of Years 1 and 2) after transfer to recipient cows (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination (A), 45–48 days post-insemination (B), and by live-born calves (C).
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Embryo survival after transfer of either 1 or 2 embryos into each recipient cow (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination, 45–48 days post-insemination, and by live-born calves.
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Embryo survival after transfer of either 1 or 2 embryos into each recipient cow (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination, 45–48 days post-insemination, and by live-born calves.
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
Embryo survival after transfer of either 1 or 2 embryos into each recipient cow (n = 32 and 67 in Years 1 and 2 respectively), detected by ultrasonography at 28–30 days post-insemination, 45–48 days post-insemination, and by live-born calves.
Citation: Reproduction 134, 2; 10.1530/REP-07-0021
The research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund. We gratefully acknowledge Bioniche Animal Health for providing Folltropin-V, Lutropin-V, CIDR-B, embryo collection and transfer supplies, and Bill Kerr and his staff at the Goodale Research Farm, University of Saskatchewan for animal care and maintenance. We thank Dr Albert Barth and Dr Andres Arteaga for evaluating semen for experiments. We also thank Dr Vladmir Pawlyshyn, Dr Marcos Colazo, Dr Marcelo Martinez, Dr Durairaj Saravanan, Andrew McCarthy, Nicole Wensink, Melissa Maximnuk, Ross Hawkes, Laura Marshall, and Jody Barry for their assistance with data collection. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.
References
Adams GP1999 Comparative patterns of follicle development and selection in ruminants. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54 17–32.
Adams GP & Pierson RA1995 Bovine model for study of ovarian follicular dynamics in humans. Theriogenology 43 113–120.
Adams GP, Matteri RL, Kastelic JP, Ko JC & Ginther OJ1992 Association between surges of follicle-stimulating hormone and the emergence of follicular waves in heifers. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 94 177–188.
Anonymous2004 Aging and infertility in women. Fertility and Sterility 82 S102–S106.
Ashkenazi J, Orvieto R, Gold-Deutch R , Feldberg D , Dicker D, Voliovitch I & Ben-Rafael Z1996 The impact of woman’s age and sperm parameters on fertilization rates in IVF cycles. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 66 155–159.
Baerwald AR, Adams GP & Pierson RA2003a A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertility and Sterility 80 116–122.
Baerwald AR, Adams GP & Pierson RA2003b Characterization of ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women. Biology of Reproduction 69 1023–1031.
Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, Evers LH, Gianaroli L, Leridon H, Sunde A, Templeton A, Van Steirteghem A, Cohen J,et al.2005 Fertility and ageing. Human Reproduction Update 11 261–276.
Blake D, Proctor M, Johnson N & Olive D2005 Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4 Art no.: CD002118. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2.
Bo GA, Adams GP, Pierson RA, Tribulo HE, Caccia M & Mapletoft RJ1994 Follicular wave dynamics after estradiol-17β treatment of heifers with or without progestogen implant. Theriogenology 41 1555–1569.
Burns DS, Jimenez-Krassel F, Ireland JL, Knight PG & Ireland JJ2005 Numbers of antral follicles during follicular waves in cattle: evidence for high variation among animals, very high repeatability in individuals, and an inverse association with serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations. Biology of Reproduction 73 54–62.
Carnevale EM & Ginther OJ1995 Defective oocytes as a cause of subfertility in old mares. Biology of Reproduction Mono 1 209–214.
Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC & Jones J2005 Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health and Statistics 23 1–160.
Dew JE, Don RA, Hughes GJ, Johnson TC & Steigrad SJ1998 The influence of advanced age on the outcome of assisted reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 15 210–214.
Erickson BH, Reynolds RA & Murphree RL1976 Ovarian characteristics and reproductive performance of the aged cow. Biology of 15 555–560.
Fujino Y, Ozaki K, Yamamasu S, Ito F, Matsuoka I, Hayashi E, Nakamura H, Ogita S, Sato E & Inoue M1996 DNA fragmentation of oocytes in aged mice. Human Reproduction 11 1480–1483.
Ginther OJ, Kastelic JP & Knopf L1989 Composition and characteristic of follicular waves during the bovine estrus cycle. Animal Reproduction Science 20 187–200.
Hull MG, Fleming CF, Hughes AO & McDermott A1996 The age-related decline in female fecundity: a quantitative controlled study of implanting capacity and survival of individual embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 65 783–790.
Janny L & Menezo YJ1996 Maternal age effect on early human embryonic development and blastocyst formation. Molecular Reproduction and Development 45 31–37.
Klein J & Sauer MV2001 Assessing fertility in women of advanced reproductive age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185 758–770.
Klein NA, Battaglia DE, Fujimoto VY, Davis GS, Bremner WJ & Soules MR1996 Reproductive aging: accelerated ovarian follicular development associated with a monotropic follicle-stimulating hormone rise in normal older women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 81 1038–1045.
Klein NA, Houmard BS, Hansen KR, Woodruff TK, Sluss PM, Bremner WJ & Soules MR2004 Age-related analysis of inhibin A, inhibin B, and activin a relative to the intercycle monotropic follicle-stimulating hormone rise in normal ovulatory women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 89 2977–2981.
Lerner SP, Thayne WV, Baker RD, Henschen T, Meredith S, Inskeep EK, Dailey RA, Lewis PE & Butcher RL1986 Age, dose of FSH and other factors affecting superovulation in Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 63 176–183.
Lim AS & Tsakok MF1997 Age-related decline in fertility: a link to degenerative oocytes? Fertility and Sterility 68 265–271.
Malhi PS, Adams GP & Singh J2005 Bovine model for the study of reproductive aging in women: follicular, luteal, and endocrine characteristics. Biology of Reproduction 73 45–53.
Malhi PS, Adams GP, Pierson RA & Singh J2006 Bovine model of reproductive aging: response to ovarian synchronization and superstimulation. Theriogenology 66 1257–1266.
Mapletoft RJ, Steward KB & Adams GP2002 Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 42 601–611.
Menken J, Trussell J & Larsen U1986 Age and infertility. Science 233 1389–1394.
Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C & Demaille J2003 Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Human Genetics 112 195–203.
Sauer MV1998 The impact of age on reproductive potential: lessons learned from oocyte donation. Maturitas 30 221–225.
Schwartz D & Mayaux MJ1982 Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. New England Journal of Medicine 306 404–406.
Soules MR, Sherman S, Parrott E, Rebar R, Santoro N, Utian W & Woods N2001 Executive summary: stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW). Fertility and Sterility 76 874–878.
Spandorfer SD, Davis OK, Barmat LI, Chung PH & Rosenwaks Z2004 Relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization pregnancy loss. Fertility and Sterility 81 1265–1269.
Stringfellow DA & Seidel SM1998 Manual of the IETS. pp 103–130. Savoy, IL: IETS.
Tietze C1957 Reproductive span and rate of reproduction among Hutterite women. Fertility and Sterility 8 89–97.
Wright VC, Chang J, Jeng G & Macaluso M2006 Assisted reproductive technology surveillance–United States, 2003. MMWR Surveillance Summaries 55 1–22.
