Methylation dynamics during folliculogenesis and early embryo development in sheep

in Reproduction
Authors:
Laura MasalaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Laura Masala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giovanni Pietro BurraiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Giovanni Pietro Burrai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emanuela BelluDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Emanuela Bellu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Federica AriuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Federica Ariu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luisa BoglioloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Luisa Bogliolo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sergio LeddaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Sergio Ledda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Daniela BebbereDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Search for other papers by Daniela Bebbere in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Correspondence should be addressed to D Bebbere; Email: dbebbere@uniss.it
Free access

The journal and the authors regret an error in this article published in the May (vol 153, issue 5 pp 605–619) issue of the journal. Figures 1 and 2 were erroneously repeated although the legends were correct. Figure 2 and its legend is correct as published and the correct Figure 1 is published below with the correct legend. The journal apologises for this error.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Relative expression of DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, TET1, TET2, TET3, MBD1, MBD3 and MBD4 in ovine growing oocytes (GO) at different diameter derived from pre-pubertal animals: 70–90 (small; S GO), 90–110 (medium; M GO) or 110–130 μM (large; L GO) diameter. The relative quantification of all transcripts was performed after normalization against luciferase mRNA levels and the number of oocytes and embryos (Su et al. 2007, Ohsugi et al. 2008, Evsikov et al. 2009). Relative abundance values are expressed as ΔCq (Y axis) and show the mean value ± s.e.m. of five replicates for each stage (each replicate = pool of 30 oocytes). Different letters indicate a significant difference in relative mRNA abundance (ANOVA P < 0.05) among the groups.

Citation: Reproduction 154, 1; 10.1530/REP-16-0644e

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand

     An official journal of

    Society for Reproduction and Fertility

 

  • View in gallery
    Figure 1

    Relative expression of DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, TET1, TET2, TET3, MBD1, MBD3 and MBD4 in ovine growing oocytes (GO) at different diameter derived from pre-pubertal animals: 70–90 (small; S GO), 90–110 (medium; M GO) or 110–130 μM (large; L GO) diameter. The relative quantification of all transcripts was performed after normalization against luciferase mRNA levels and the number of oocytes and embryos (Su et al. 2007, Ohsugi et al. 2008, Evsikov et al. 2009). Relative abundance values are expressed as ΔCq (Y axis) and show the mean value ± s.e.m. of five replicates for each stage (each replicate = pool of 30 oocytes). Different letters indicate a significant difference in relative mRNA abundance (ANOVA P < 0.05) among the groups.