The journal and the authors apologise for an error in the above titled article published in this journal (vol 144, pp 433–445). The authors inadvertently presented duplicate sperm images for XY and XESxrbO mouse testes of Fig. 6 (bottom panels). This error does not change the findings of the paper, as this figure does not give a quantitative breakdown of the proportions of different shapes.
The correct Fig. 6 is published below along with the corresponding legend.