Absence of species specificity for mammalian sperm capacitation in vivo

in Reproduction
Authors:
Patricia M. Saling
Search for other papers by Patricia M. Saling in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
J. M. Bedford
Search for other papers by J. M. Bedford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0630119
Volume/Issue:
Volume 63: Issue 1
Page Range:
119–123
Article Type:
Research Article
Online Publication Date:
Sep 1981
Free access

Sign up for journal news

Summary. Spermatozoa and eggs of one species were transferred into the oviducts of other species to examine the specificity of mammalian sperm capacitation in vivo. Using mice, rats, hamsters and rabbits, 11 different combinations of gametes and host were tested, with cumulus-intact and cumulus-free eggs being placed in opposite oviducts of a recipient. In all combinations compatible with the maintenance of sperm motility over a period sufficient for capacitation, fusion occurred between homologous gametes without regard to the identity of the host environment. The period required for capacitation, as judged by the timing of egg penetration, was a function of the specific character of the spermatozoon more than of the 'oestrous' oviduct. Fertilization level was not enhanced significantly by the presence of the cumulus oophorus, with the single striking exception of mouse eggs in the hamster. Sperm viability was not always optimal in a foreign tract; mouse and hamster spermatozoa became immotile within 2 h in the rabbit. Despite this limitation on sperm viability, some mouse eggs were fertilized in the rabbit, indicating that capacitation is possible even when the environment is suboptimal for motility maintenance. Therefore, while the results indicate that there is no specificity for capacitation as such, it should not be inferred that there is a total absence of specificity in the relationship between the female reproductive tract and gametes.

Reproduction is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.

The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.

More information is on the Reasons to publish page.

Sept 2018 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Full Text Views 117 26 3
PDF Downloads 73 21 0

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Print ISSN:
1470-1626
Online ISSN:
1741-7899